Constraints Faced by Healthcare Endowments

February 17, 2017 |
1 minute read
|

As a result of the evolving landscape of the healthcare industry, organizations are increasingly being shaped by pressures affecting both the revenue and expense sides of the income statement.

On one side, you have revenue. These pressures take the form of tighter standards for government and insurance reimbursement. On the expense side, healthcare organizations have already carried out cost-cutting steps. However, it is clear that the larger organizations, with their ability to spread cost reductions over a wider patient and constituent user base and to weather reimbursement reductions, are the first movers and will reap greater benefit than the smaller and mid-sized organizations with their proportionately higher fixed cost base.

A Growing Reliance on Endowments

As a result of this changing environment, it seems inevitable that there will be much greater reliance by these organizations on the endowment to enhance surpluses and make up for losses. Doing this, however, will not be a simple task. Healthcare organizations continue to face constraints in optimizing the return from their endowments. This is because both their inpatient and outpatient facilities and related medical equipment have a relatively short lifespan as advances in healthcare treatment and technology accelerate their obsolescence and mandate renovation or rebuilding on a regular basis.

Many nonprofit institutions make use of bond issues to fund brick-and-mortar construction projects and improvements. A successful bond offering depends in large part on the ability of the bonds to earn a high rating from the bond rating agencies, which look not only to the ability of the healthcare provider to generate cash flow but also to the liquidity of its endowment’s financial assets as a potential backstop source of repayment. Indeed, liquidity measures have come to form a key metric in determining bond ratings.

For this reason, the asset allocations of healthcare endowments have tended, on average, to be more heavily weighted toward cash and fixed income investments than those of other types of nonprofits. The following table compares healthcare organizations’ dollar-weighted asset allocations to those of community foundations and educational endowments, as reported in the most recent Commonfund studies for the relevant sector.

chart_comparison-of-healthcare-orgs_984x294

Dive deeper into this data and learn more about healthcare endowments, including the dangers of indebtedness and re-balancing relationships.

Download the Commonfund Whitepaper

Stay connected with the Insights Blog

Popular Blog Posts


Governance And Policy | Insights Blog

What is an OCIO?

Outsourced investment management, once primarily a solution for small institutions with limited resources, is now used by a broad range of long-term investors. When properly implemented, outsourcing...
Investment Strategy | Insights Blog

Balancing Purpose, Payout, and Permanence: A Strategy Guide for Foundations

In partnership with the Council on Foundations, the National Center for Family Philanthropy has released Balancing Purpose, Payout, and Permanence: Strategy Guide. Commonfund Institute is very happy...
Investment Strategy | Insights Blog

Chart of the Month | Inflation Expectations Surge, Driving Real Interest Rates Down

Chairman Powell’s speech at Jackson Hole during the last week of August confirmed the Fed’s dovish policy stance, giving investors ample support in terms of low rates and a flexible inflation...

Disclaimer

Information, opinions, or commentary concerning the financial markets, economic conditions, or other topical subject matter are prepared, written, or created prior to printing and do not reflect current, up-to-date, market or economic conditions. Commonfund disclaims any responsibility to update such information, opinions, or commentary. To the extent views presented forecast market activity, they may be based on many factors in addition to those explicitly stated in this material. Forecasts of experts inevitably differ. Views attributed to third parties are presented to demonstrate the existence of points of view, not as a basis for recommendations or as investment advice. Managers who may or may not subscribe to the views expressed in this material make investment decisions for funds maintained by Commonfund or its affiliates. The views presented in this material may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Commonfund fund, or of any Commonfund manager. Market and investment views of third parties presented in this material do not necessarily reflect the views of Commonfund and Commonfund disclaims any responsibility to present its views on the subjects covered in statements by third parties. Statements concerning Commonfund’s views of possible future outcomes in any investment asset class or market, or of possible future economic developments, are not intended, and should not be construed, as forecasts or predictions of the future investment performance of any Commonfund fund. Such statements are also not intended as recommendations by any Commonfund entity or employee to the recipient of the presentation. It is Commonfund’s policy that investment recommendations to its clients must be based on the investment objectives and risk tolerances of each individual client. All market outlook and similar statements are based upon information reasonably available as of the date of this presentation (unless an earlier date is stated with regard to particular information), and reasonably believed to be accurate by Commonfund. Commonfund disclaims any responsibility to provide the recipient of this presentation with updated or corrected information. Past performance is not indicative of future results. For more information please refer to Important Disclosures.