According to data from Commonfund's Benchmarks Studies, Outsourced Chief Investment Officer (OCIO) usage is on the rise among private and community foundations and higher education over the past 10 years. OCIO models are often used primarily for investment management, but levels of discretion can vary depending on institutional capacity, and services can span operations, risk management, and strategic decision making.
Why are nonprofit investors seeking an OCIO? It can be for any number of reasons but we have highlighted those that we see consistently for institutions managing long-term pools of capital.
Increasing portfolio complexity
- Multiple dimensions of risk to be managed (liquidity, geopolitical, operational, etc.).
- Allocations to alternatives are now the largest allocation at 35+% for the average foundation across asset size1; this increases demands on staff and Investment Committee’s (IC) in investment diligence and administrative support, particularly for illiquid investments.
Evolving fiduciary responsibility
- With the enactment of UPMIFA in 2006, and increased transparency from 990s, nonprofit boards have heightened responsibility in terms of strategic policy design and oversight.
- Increased and more complex state- and federal-based regulatory landscape
- As appropriate, perpetual time horizon and mission-related risks to consider and manage.
Concerns regarding alignment of interests and accountability
- The emergence of more capacity-constrained2 managers raises the potential for increasing conflicts of interest; this increases demands on IC’s to vet such potential conflicts.
- For many institutions, ensuring accountability and clear communication to donors, public officials, community, and other stakeholders regarding effective investment stewardship is critical.
Challenges with limited resources/time
- Many institutions average 5-7 volunteer investment committee members and rarely have staff dedicated to managing the endowment; this may limit investment options or slow decision making. This is especially important concerning scenario planning, updating risk analysis, and any other time-sensitive inquiries.
Heightened demand for more comprehensive risk management
- Increased allocation to alternative investments demands greater focus on risk management across the portfolio. How investment risk impacts and aligns with enterprise risk is increasingly important.
Need for quicker decision making
- The traditional IC/consultant structure with quarterly meetings may lead to missed opportunities or inconsistent oversight.
In conclusion, the rise in Outsourced Chief Investment Officer (OCIO) usage among nonprofit institutions underscores the increasing complexity and challenges faced in managing long-term capital. As nonprofit organizations seek to align interests, enhance accountability, and optimize resources, exploring the benefits of an OCIO model can provide a strategic advantage in managing investment portfolios effectively. To delve deeper into this topic and explore how OCIO services can benefit your institution, we encourage you to explore our research center on this topic.
Want to learn more about how Commonfund can help your organization? Connect with Us.
- Capacity-constrained managers are fund managers that accept only a limited number of investors.