According to data from Commonfund's Benchmarks Studies, Outsourced Chief Investment Officer (OCIO) usage is on the rise among private and community foundations and higher education over the past 10 years. OCIO models are often used primarily for investment management, but levels of discretion can vary depending on institutional capacity, and services can span operations, risk management, and strategic decision making.
Why are nonprofit investors seeking an OCIO? It can be for any number of reasons but we have highlighted those that we see consistently for institutions managing long-term pools of capital.
|
Reason |
Details |
|---|---|
|
Increasing portfolio complexity |
|
|
Evolving fiduciary responsibility |
|
|
Concerns regarding alignment of interests and accountability |
|
|
Challenges with limited resources/time |
|
|
Heightened demand for more comprehensive risk management |
|
|
Need for quicker decision making |
|
In conclusion, the rise in Outsourced Chief Investment Officer (OCIO) usage among nonprofit institutions underscores the increasing complexity and challenges faced in managing long-term capital. As nonprofit organizations seek to align interests, enhance accountability, and optimize resources, exploring the benefits of an OCIO model can provide a strategic advantage in managing investment portfolios effectively. To delve deeper into this topic and explore how OCIO services can benefit your institution, we encourage you to explore our research center on this topic.
Want to learn more about how Commonfund can help your organization? Connect with Us.
- Capacity-constrained managers are fund managers that accept only a limited number of investors.
