Investment Governance | Are You Asking These Three Questions?

December 11, 2020 |
2 minute read
|

In the midst of a global pandemic, many non-profit business models are being challenged which has put significant pressures on staff, governing boards and committees. These pressures on time and effectiveness have led many to question their investment governance models, specifically asking:

  • Do we have the right people making the right decisions on the right topics?
  • Does our Investment Committee focus on issues that can measurably impact our mission?
  • Who is accountable for performance?

Based on our work with hundreds of endowments, foundations and other philanthropic organizations, we offer the following insights on investment governance practices:

Question #1:
Do we have the right people making the right decisions on the right topics?

This question is at the heart of good governance and is arguably the most important question for fiduciaries to ask. High performing boards typically check each of these boxes, and boards and committees should ask this question of themselves in their annual self-assessment process. Of course, the right people must have the will, skill and knowledge for a board or committee role, but equally as important, strong boards and committees should bring diversity of thought through different backgrounds, life experiences and perspectives. There is increasing evidence that diversity and inclusion go hand and hand to drive results. Further, to foster such diversity of thought it is important to maintain term limits for boards and committees, and to recruit new talent, yet to do so in a thoughtful way to maintain institutional knowledge.

Question #2:
Does our Investment Committee focus on issues that can measurably impact our mission?

Typically, a Board will delegate fiduciary responsibility to an Investment Committee for the oversight of the endowment or other asset pools. And, such Committees typically engage a consultant or Outsourced Chief Investment Office (“OCIO”), to assist in that responsibility. Yet, depending on which investment governance model you select, the time you spend on different topics can vary, often at the expense of strategic considerations. For example, are you finding that a great deal of committee time is spent selecting asset managers or drilling into a hedge fund strategy, or wading through investment documents? Our experience is that Committee time is typically better spent on strategic discussions that directly impact the likelihood of achieving your mission. For a college or university this may include understanding how financial and operating metrics of the institution can inform asset allocation. And, for a community foundation or private foundation it may be weighing the impact of a change in spending policy in light of increased market demand for charitable services. Lastly, diversity is an important attribute for the Investment Committee, too, and may not be fulfilled by simply ensuring that you’ve included experts in various investments – the committee will benefit most from diversity of background, gender, race and experience.

Question #3:
Who is accountable for performance?

Finally, achieving your investment objective, typically some combination of your spending rate plus inflation and costs (and potentially a growth element), is a consequence of good investment governance. But who is actually accountable for the performance? If you have an internal investment office, the answer is easy. Likewise, if you have a discretionary OCIO model, accountability is clear. However, when the roles and responsibilities in the oversight and management of a portfolio are shared with some discretion with a consultant, for example, and final manager selection residing with the Committee, accountability can get murky. And when accountability is unclear, it is very difficult to make necessary changes in a timely fashion. Our experience draws from the old adage that “too many cooks spoil the broth”. In other words, decision making needs to be centralized and clear or you increase the risk of not achieving your long-term return objectives.

Keith Luke

Author

Keith Luke

Stay connected with the Insights Blog

Popular Blog Posts


Investment Strategy | Insights Blog

What is an OCIO?

Outsourced investment management, once primarily a solution for small institutions with limited resources, is now used by a broad range of long-term investors. When properly implemented, outsourcing...
Governance And Policy | Insights Blog

Five Key Points of the Investment Policy Statement

The central document guiding the management of a nonprofit institution’s endowment—essentially, the strategic plan of the investment committee—is the investment policy statement (IPS). The IPS should...
Investment Strategy | Insights Blog

How to Measure Private Equity Investments

Private capital investors use a particular set of quantitative and qualitative measures to assess performance. While the standard benchmarks used for marketable securities are sometimes applied to...

Disclaimer

Information, opinions, or commentary concerning the financial markets, economic conditions, or other topical subject matter are prepared, written, or created prior to printing and do not reflect current, up-to-date, market or economic conditions. Commonfund disclaims any responsibility to update such information, opinions, or commentary. To the extent views presented forecast market activity, they may be based on many factors in addition to those explicitly stated in this material. Forecasts of experts inevitably differ. Views attributed to third parties are presented to demonstrate the existence of points of view, not as a basis for recommendations or as investment advice. Managers who may or may not subscribe to the views expressed in this material make investment decisions for funds maintained by Commonfund or its affiliates. The views presented in this material may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Commonfund fund, or of any Commonfund manager. Market and investment views of third parties presented in this material do not necessarily reflect the views of Commonfund and Commonfund disclaims any responsibility to present its views on the subjects covered in statements by third parties. Statements concerning Commonfund’s views of possible future outcomes in any investment asset class or market, or of possible future economic developments, are not intended, and should not be construed, as forecasts or predictions of the future investment performance of any Commonfund fund. Such statements are also not intended as recommendations by any Commonfund entity or employee to the recipient of the presentation. It is Commonfund’s policy that investment recommendations to its clients must be based on the investment objectives and risk tolerances of each individual client. All market outlook and similar statements are based upon information reasonably available as of the date of this presentation (unless an earlier date is stated with regard to particular information), and reasonably believed to be accurate by Commonfund. Commonfund disclaims any responsibility to provide the recipient of this presentation with updated or corrected information. Past performance is not indicative of future results. For more information please refer to Important Disclosures.