Investment Objectives? Not Always.

October 13, 2022 |
1 minute read
|

The 2021 Council on Foundations—Commonfund Study of Investment of Endowments for Private and Community Foundations® (CCSF) marked our tenth year in collaboration with the Council on Foundations. The focus of the Viewpoint is on the long term and reviewed select data that our research has uncovered over the years—not data for data’s sake, but rather for insights into the evolution of foundations’ endowment management over the decade and the implications they may carry for the future. In this third blog of the series, we take a closer look at investment objectives. 

The previous blog in this series discussed the subject of asset allocation as the bedrock of investment policy statements because through it, nonprofit organizations seek to preserve the value of the assets—by diversifying the portfolio—while also growing the assets (covering inflation and expenses plus, ideally, a growth increment). It is surprising, then, that in a typical year anywhere from 15 to 25 percent of foundations participating in the CCSF say they do not have long-term investment objectives.

It has been a regular pattern over the past eight years for private foundations to have long-term investment objectives at a higher rate than community foundations (regular, but not consistent as community foundations had long-term objectives at higher rates in 2015 and 2017). Over the period, on average, 80 percent of private foundations reported having objectives each year; the average for community foundations has been 75 percent. Over the past four years, private foundations have shown some momentum, as the 82 percent that had objectives in 2018 grew to 83 percent the next two years and to 84 percent in 2021. Over the same period, community foundations actually lagged their rates from earlier in the decade, as only 67 percent to 76 percent had long-term objectives.

Conclusion

The point is that the investment objective informs the asset allocation. A long-term objective of 4.0 percent and one of 7.5 percent require very different asset allocations. If a look back prompts a change going forward, this merits attention.

On a related subject, risk is or should be a significant part of every investment policy statement (IPS). Yet in this Study, only 56 percent of private foundations and 49 percent of community foundations have an IPS that defines risk. Compared with the 2018 Study, that is a modest improvement for private foundations but a lower rate for community foundations. Perhaps this is another subject that warrants active discussion.

Interested in learning more? 

New call-to-action

Stay connected with the Insights Blog

Popular Blog Posts


Market Commentary | Insights Blog

Chart of the Month | The Surprising Relationship Between Money Supply and Inflation

The potential for rising inflation is becoming a top concern for many investors and consumers. Many believe that inflation is already here as evidenced by price increases in commodities, homes,...
Perspectives | Insights Blog

In Remembrance: Verne O. Sedlacek

A Gentle Giant The Commonfund community was shocked and saddened this week by the news of the sudden passing of our former President and CEO, Verne Sedlacek at the age of 67.
Investment Strategy | Insights Blog

What is an OCIO?

Outsourced investment management, once primarily a solution for small institutions with limited resources, is now used by a broad range of long-term investors. When properly implemented, outsourcing...

Disclaimer

Information, opinions, or commentary concerning the financial markets, economic conditions, or other topical subject matter are prepared, written, or created prior to printing and do not reflect current, up-to-date, market or economic conditions. Commonfund disclaims any responsibility to update such information, opinions, or commentary. To the extent views presented forecast market activity, they may be based on many factors in addition to those explicitly stated in this material. Forecasts of experts inevitably differ. Views attributed to third parties are presented to demonstrate the existence of points of view, not as a basis for recommendations or as investment advice. Managers who may or may not subscribe to the views expressed in this material make investment decisions for funds maintained by Commonfund or its affiliates. The views presented in this material may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Commonfund fund, or of any Commonfund manager. Market and investment views of third parties presented in this material do not necessarily reflect the views of Commonfund and Commonfund disclaims any responsibility to present its views on the subjects covered in statements by third parties. Statements concerning Commonfund’s views of possible future outcomes in any investment asset class or market, or of possible future economic developments, are not intended, and should not be construed, as forecasts or predictions of the future investment performance of any Commonfund fund. Such statements are also not intended as recommendations by any Commonfund entity or employee to the recipient of the presentation. It is Commonfund’s policy that investment recommendations to its clients must be based on the investment objectives and risk tolerances of each individual client. All market outlook and similar statements are based upon information reasonably available as of the date of this presentation (unless an earlier date is stated with regard to particular information), and reasonably believed to be accurate by Commonfund. Commonfund disclaims any responsibility to provide the recipient of this presentation with updated or corrected information. Past performance is not indicative of future results. For more information please refer to Important Disclosures.