Lagarde Offers Little Comfort Amidst All Time High ECB Rates

October 1, 2023 |
2 minute read

Last Thursday marked the tenth hike of the European Central Bank (“ECB”) deposit rate.

This hike was particularly significant due to a combination of factors:

  1. Since the inception of the Euro in 1999, the ECB deposit rate has never hit 4 percent.
  2. Until last week the all-time peak for ECB rates was 3.75 percent over a 3-month period from December 2000 to March 2001.

To contextualize this, the last time ECB rates were remotely close to current levels, the Euro had been in circulation for less than a year. Additionally, the economic reasoning behind these elevated rates was quite different than what we are currently witnessing.

The largest differences stem from the economic picture in the Eurozone today versus the past. When rates were last at 3.75 percent in 2000, the European Union was in a period of robust economic growth. While the Euro was beginning to gain adoption, higher rates were used as a tactic to attract new capital and gain adoption, with the main goal of expanding the Eurozone. During this time, the Eurozone economy was also booming with year-over-year GDP growth sitting at approximately 3.2 percent. The newly formed ECB instituted strict monetary policy focused on controlling inflation. As a result, inflation in the Eurozone was relatively low hovering around the target 2 percent. Additionally, prices and the labor market were stable and there was no upward pressure on commodities. At the time, higher rates were a positive indicator, and a show of confidence in the future of the Eurozone and the global economy.

Today, we have quite the opposite situation. The Eurozone is battling low GDP growth, about one fourth of the levels found in late 2000. Much worse is that Eurozone inflation is at 5.2 percent. Throughout 2022, the region experienced immense upward pressure on commodity prices (more than the U.S.) due to the Russia/Ukraine conflict. One will recall spiking natural gas and electricity prices in the latter half of the year – both pressures that have just recently ceased contributing to higher inflation. On the other hand, Eurozone labor/wage markets have had similar dislocations to the U.S. as the unemployment rate is at a multi-decade low.

Unlike in 2000, the intent behind the current rate cycle has been to dial back runaway inflation and tighten the money supply. The two scenarios share little in common. Yet, while all the symptoms are the opposite of what we were experiencing in 2000, why is the ECB facing the same solution? While Europe is not unique in facing low growth and high inflation, it is noteworthy to consider another point at which there was a widespread systemic failure in the global economy. During the Global Financial Crisis, ECB rates peaked at 3.25 percent, followed by a series of cuts ending with the ECB rate at 25 basis points by the first quarter of 2009. The Eurozone is in unchartered territory regarding rate levels, and while some ECB governors have advocated for a pause, President Lagarde has not said this is the peak for interest rates. She has, however, acknowledged the increase in borrowing costs is having the intended impact of tightening financial conditions. As seen in this month’s chart, rates currently sit at 3.9 percent, with investors pricing in hikes through mid-2024.

The economic landscape in Europe implies that the ECB is more distant from their last rate cut than the Fed. Lagarde has acknowledged that it is unclear how long the ECB’s tightening cycle will persist due to the unprecedented situation but is reluctant to provide further details. 



Arjun Sawai


Arjun Sawai

Stay connected with the Insights Blog

Popular Blog Posts

Market Commentary | Insights Blog

Chart of the Month | The Surprising Relationship Between Money Supply and Inflation

The potential for rising inflation is becoming a top concern for many investors and consumers. Many believe that inflation is already here as evidenced by price increases in commodities, homes,...
Perspectives | Insights Blog

The Case for Using the Higher Education Price Index® (HEPI) to Define Inflation for Colleges

When calculating return targets for an endowment portfolio, a conventional piece of the equation is often the Consumer Price Index (CPI). CPI plus 5% is the common short-hand formula for institutions...
Governance And Policy | Insights Blog

Endowment Management and the Three Primary Responsibilities of a Board

The fourth blog in the “Six Ps of Investment Stewardship” series addresses People, specifically how boards function within an organization. To learn more about the first four principles in the series...


Certain information contained herein has been obtained from or is based on third-party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified. Such information is as of the date indicated, if indicated, may not be complete, is subject to change and has not necessarily been updated. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is or will be given by The Common Fund for Nonprofit Organizations, any of its affiliates or any of its or their affiliates, trustees, directors, officers, employees or advisers (collectively referred to herein as “Commonfund”) or any other person as to the accuracy or completeness of the information in any third-party materials. Accordingly, Commonfund shall not be liable for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on any statement in, or omission from, such third-party materials, and any such liability is expressly disclaimed.

All rights to the trademarks, copyrights, logos and other intellectual property listed herein belong to their respective owners and the use of such logos hereof does not imply an affiliation with, or endorsement by, the owners of such trademarks, copyrights, logos and other intellectual property.

To the extent views presented forecast market activity, they may be based on many factors in addition to those explicitly stated herein. Forecasts of experts inevitably differ. Views attributed to third-parties are presented to demonstrate the existence of points of view, not as a basis for recommendations or as investment advice. Market and investment views of third-parties presented herein do not necessarily reflect the views of Commonfund, any manager retained by Commonfund to manage any investments for Commonfund (each, a “Manager”) or any fund managed by any Commonfund entity (each, a “Fund”). Accordingly, the views presented herein may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of Commonfund, any Manager or any Fund.

Statements concerning Commonfund’s views of possible future outcomes in any investment asset class or market, or of possible future economic developments, are not intended, and should not be construed, as forecasts or predictions of the future investment performance of any Fund. Such statements are also not intended as recommendations by any Commonfund entity or any Commonfund employee to the recipient of the presentation. It is Commonfund’s policy that investment recommendations to its clients must be based on the investment objectives and risk tolerances of each individual client. All market outlook and similar statements are based upon information reasonably available as of the date of this presentation (unless an earlier date is stated with regard to particular information), and reasonably believed to be accurate by Commonfund. Commonfund disclaims any responsibility to provide the recipient of this presentation with updated or corrected information or statements. Past performance is not indicative of future results. For more information please refer to Important Disclosures.