New Environmental Regulations and the Impact on Fiduciaries

January 20, 2016 |
1 minute read
|

Developments in world financial markets seem to occur more quickly every year, requiring ever-higher levels of expertise and experience on the part of investment committees. Climate change is a more slowly-evolving issue that will require a more strategic approach from trustees and investments committees. Environmental regulations like The Paris Agreement and the Clean Power Plan clearly raise important investment considerations for institutional investors. In addition, beyond portfolio considerations, practical issues suggest themselves.

For colleges and universities:

  • Will the Paris Agreement and the Plan mean higher or lower energy costs for institutions that maintain extensive campus facilities?
  • What will the impact be on tuition and fees?

For private and community foundations:

  • How will the proposed regulations affect the various sustainability initiatives that many of these institutions have supported?
  • How will private and community foundation grantees be affected?

These questions, and the implications for portfolio risk and return, are difficult to answer definitively in the current highly fluid decision-making environment. While there will doubtless be a wide range of ways in which states do or do not implement the proposed regulations, the announcement of the Clean Power Plan has set in motion a process to which fiduciaries should be attentive, particularly with respect to the effect of the regulations — whatever their final form — on the state or states in which they operate.

From the point of view of a nonprofit fiduciary, the place to begin an analysis of the implications of the Clean Power Plan is by reviewing the institution’s investment policy statement (IPS). Here, assuming that the board is open to or actively considering the possibility of a low carbon portfolio, a number of questions arise:

  • How will introduction of a low carbon strategy affect the asset allocation targets and ranges in the policy portfolio?
  • How might the portfolio’s current expected returns and sustainable spending rates be affected?
  • How will implementation of a low carbon strategy affect risk targets?
  • What other portfolio changes might be needed to meet the institution’s required rate of return?
  • Are there implications for the institution’s mission?

Fiduciaries may want to consider, as one potential solution, a well-diversified, multi-asset low carbon investment portfolio that reduces risk by systematically limiting allocations to carbon-based assets while maintaining the diversification benefit that comes from a lower level of controlled exposure.

Download Today

Stay connected with the Insights Blog

Popular Blog Posts


Governance And Policy | Insights Blog

What is an OCIO?

Outsourced investment management, once primarily a solution for small institutions with limited resources, is now used by a broad range of long-term investors. When properly implemented, outsourcing...
Governance And Policy | Insights Blog

Should We Issue an Investment Manager RFP? 7 Key Considerations

Best practice for nonprofits is to issue a Request for Proposal (“RFP”) for an investment management partner every market cycle. Typically, that is at least every 7 to 10 years, or as it is...
Governance And Policy | Insights Blog

Observations on Diverse Manager Selection Across Asset Classes

At Commonfund, we believe diverse managers offer clients access to investment talent and valuable investment opportunities and therefore should be explored and invested in. Overlooking the merits of...

Disclaimer

Information, opinions, or commentary concerning the financial markets, economic conditions, or other topical subject matter are prepared, written, or created prior to printing and do not reflect current, up-to-date, market or economic conditions. Commonfund disclaims any responsibility to update such information, opinions, or commentary. To the extent views presented forecast market activity, they may be based on many factors in addition to those explicitly stated in this material. Forecasts of experts inevitably differ. Views attributed to third parties are presented to demonstrate the existence of points of view, not as a basis for recommendations or as investment advice. Managers who may or may not subscribe to the views expressed in this material make investment decisions for funds maintained by Commonfund or its affiliates. The views presented in this material may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Commonfund fund, or of any Commonfund manager. Market and investment views of third parties presented in this material do not necessarily reflect the views of Commonfund and Commonfund disclaims any responsibility to present its views on the subjects covered in statements by third parties. Statements concerning Commonfund’s views of possible future outcomes in any investment asset class or market, or of possible future economic developments, are not intended, and should not be construed, as forecasts or predictions of the future investment performance of any Commonfund fund. Such statements are also not intended as recommendations by any Commonfund entity or employee to the recipient of the presentation. It is Commonfund’s policy that investment recommendations to its clients must be based on the investment objectives and risk tolerances of each individual client. All market outlook and similar statements are based upon information reasonably available as of the date of this presentation (unless an earlier date is stated with regard to particular information), and reasonably believed to be accurate by Commonfund. Commonfund disclaims any responsibility to provide the recipient of this presentation with updated or corrected information. Past performance is not indicative of future results. For more information please refer to Important Disclosures.