Operating Charity Implements a Risk-Based Investment Policy

May 31, 2016 |
2 minute read
|

An operating charity in the Northeast is in the process of implementing a risk-based investment policy for its $30 million endowment. The organization’s seven-member Investment Committee includes individuals with experience at leading securities and investment firms; a majority of the Committee members are graduates of the university that was the organization’s original sponsor and with which it was long affiliated.

In drafting its investment policy statement (IPS), the Committee created a separate section entitled “Risk Tolerance”. In that section, it set forth the following specific risk parameters:

Intergenerational equity was set as a minimum goal, but expansion of the endowment was also viewed as desirable. This meant that the endowment would need at least to keep pace with inflation, while also meeting its annual average spending target of 4.25 percent, net of fees and expenses, into the indefinite future. For this reason, the portfolio would have to have a bias toward equities in order to obtain the potential for future growth.

The Committee set a liquidity budget requiring that one year’s targeted spending, or 4.25 percent of the endowment, be retained in “highly liquid, low volatility instruments” on an ongoing basis. While highly illiquid instruments such as private capital limited partnerships could be part of the port- folio, this liquidity budget requirement would take priority.

Turning to market risk, the IPS required that the portfolio be constructed in such a way that there would be less than a 5 percent probability of an annual drawdown of greater than 10 percent.

With these guidelines as background, the Committee then turned to the question of constructing a portfolio that would meet these criteria. Using a Monte Carlo simulation model, four portfolios were analyzed, with equity allocations ranging from 43 percent of the portfolio to 61 percent, of which private capital allocations ranged from nearly 5 percent to over 14 percent. Fixed income and hedge allocations were also part of these proposed portfolios, as were non-U.S. dollar investments.

When it examined the results of the simulation, the Committee found that none of the portfolios met all of its requirements. The maximum drawdown constraint, in particular, led to a portfolio with an unacceptably low annual return of 6.9 percent, compared with a somewhat looser but still well-diversified portfolio that had a projected annual return of 7.6 percent. Equally relevant, the limited-drawdown portfolio had just a 38.5 percent chance of maintaining intergenerational equity over a 20-year period, while the somewhat looser portfolio’s intergenerational equity likelihood was 54.9 percent.

The Committee decided to concentrate on the looser portfolio, which had a target allocation of 55 percent to public equity, 30 percent to fixed income,  and 15 percent to private capital strategies. While the final portfolio construction has not yet been determined, the Committee agrees that the ability to perform this kind of analysis has been crucial in enabling it to construct a portfolio with a greater likelihood of behaving according to the risk prescriptions in the IPS. Further iterations will be necessary for the Committee to reach a final decision, and the parameters of the resulting portfolio will be recorded in the IPS when it is adopted by the Board.

Learn more on risk and portfolio contruction

Stay connected with the Insights Blog

Popular Blog Posts


Governance And Policy | Insights Blog

What is an OCIO?

Outsourced investment management, once primarily a solution for small institutions with limited resources, is now used by a broad range of long-term investors. When properly implemented, outsourcing...
Governance And Policy | Insights Blog

Should We Issue an Investment Manager RFP? 7 Key Considerations

Best practice for nonprofits is to issue a Request for Proposal (“RFP”) for an investment management partner every market cycle. Typically, that is at least every 7 to 10 years, or as it is...
Governance And Policy | Insights Blog

Observations on Diverse Manager Selection Across Asset Classes

At Commonfund, we believe diverse managers offer clients access to investment talent and valuable investment opportunities and therefore should be explored and invested in. Overlooking the merits of...

Disclaimer

Information, opinions, or commentary concerning the financial markets, economic conditions, or other topical subject matter are prepared, written, or created prior to printing and do not reflect current, up-to-date, market or economic conditions. Commonfund disclaims any responsibility to update such information, opinions, or commentary. To the extent views presented forecast market activity, they may be based on many factors in addition to those explicitly stated in this material. Forecasts of experts inevitably differ. Views attributed to third parties are presented to demonstrate the existence of points of view, not as a basis for recommendations or as investment advice. Managers who may or may not subscribe to the views expressed in this material make investment decisions for funds maintained by Commonfund or its affiliates. The views presented in this material may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Commonfund fund, or of any Commonfund manager. Market and investment views of third parties presented in this material do not necessarily reflect the views of Commonfund and Commonfund disclaims any responsibility to present its views on the subjects covered in statements by third parties. Statements concerning Commonfund’s views of possible future outcomes in any investment asset class or market, or of possible future economic developments, are not intended, and should not be construed, as forecasts or predictions of the future investment performance of any Commonfund fund. Such statements are also not intended as recommendations by any Commonfund entity or employee to the recipient of the presentation. It is Commonfund’s policy that investment recommendations to its clients must be based on the investment objectives and risk tolerances of each individual client. All market outlook and similar statements are based upon information reasonably available as of the date of this presentation (unless an earlier date is stated with regard to particular information), and reasonably believed to be accurate by Commonfund. Commonfund disclaims any responsibility to provide the recipient of this presentation with updated or corrected information. Past performance is not indicative of future results. For more information please refer to Important Disclosures.