Private Credit Opportunities – Direct Lending to U.S. Middle Market Companies

February 8, 2017 |
3 minute read

Much has been made of the challenges endowment, foundation and nonprofit investors face in achieving a CPI+ five percent return target. One way to improve the probability of attaining this goal is to take advantage of the so-called “liquidity premium.”

The liquidity premium is the extra return demanded by investors when an investment cannot be easily converted into cash for its fair market value. The liquidity premium has fluctuated over time, with recent readings suggesting that it could present a more attractive opportunity now than it has in recent years.

Direct lending is a fixed income opportunity that takes advantage of the liquidity premium in the credit market. Unlike long-lock private investments such as private equity, venture capital and distressed debt, the lending strategy is intermediate term in nature and is often cash-flowing soon after the first capital is called. The loans are typically floating-rate which reduces the duration risk associated with a rising rate environment. Another attractive feature is that many direct lending managers charge fees only on invested capital, which eliminates the “J-curve” problem of traditional private equity. For these reasons, direct lending is often viewed as an attractive complement to private equity investments.

Direct lending is the origination of loans by non-bank lenders, such as asset management firms, to middle market companies in generally higher yielding (below investment grade) transactions. Though definitions might vary, broadly speaking “middle-market” companies that are the target of direct lending managers generate earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) of $10 million – $75 million on revenue of $100 – $300 million.

direct lending

By our estimates, investors in direct lending strategies can receive additional compensation of as much as 600 basis points over similar quality high-yield bonds while being more senior in the capital structure and less exposed to the risk of rising rates. Direct lending does require use of modest fund level leverage to achieve these returns, however.

The opportunity for non-bank lenders to enter the space has grown in recent years as a result of changes forced upon the banks by regulators as a result of the Great Financial Crisis. Driven from the space by changes in regulations (Basel III, Dodd Frank/Volker Rule), money center and regional banks have had a reduced appetite for lending to middle market companies, and demand for middle market loans continues to remain high.

The U.S. “middle market” is estimated by some to be $4 trillion in size, and would be the fifth largest global economy based on combined revenue. There is an existing overhang of debt maturities that continue to put liquidity and refinancing pressures on these companies, and private equity sponsors have, by some estimates, in excess of $500 billion of dry powder to put to work in M&A transactions.

So what does one receive exposure to when buying a direct lending portfolio? Following are some key characteristics of direct lending portfolios:

  • Periodic income distributions

  • Floating-rate (LIBOR-based) interest

  • Target loan yield 8%-12% (before fund-level leverage)

  • 2-3 year loan average life (due to refinancing/mergers and acquisitions etc.)

  • Highly negotiated, well-structured legal documents

As money-center and regional banks have stepped away from the sector, significant amounts of capital have entered the space to fill this void, and finding the following characteristics in a direct lending manager can to lead to meaningful and repeatable outcomes. These characteristics include, but are not limited to, disciplined underwriting, better structuring, intensive loan monitoring and workout capabilities.

Disciplined underwriting includes underwriting to exit, not “loan to own”. In addition, the lender minimizes concentrated risks, volatility and cyclical industries. The best lenders also seek to avoid industries and jurisdictions where lenders’ rights could be at risk. Examples of better structures are more robust loan covenants with favorable lending terms and stronger control over amendments than is typically seen in broadly syndicated loans. Typically, the lender can negotiate to have a board observer, and detailed monthly management reporting with key performance metrics chosen by the lender. Intensive loan monitoring includes frequent dialogue with borrowers and private equity sponsors. Finally workout capabilities become necessary if a covenant breach is likely to occur, and it is critical that lenders have the capabilities to manage the workout, restructuring and the bankruptcy process.

In the current low yield environment where income is scarce and interest rate sensitivity is a concern, capturing the liquidity premium through direct lending via floating rate loans may be a compelling building block in constructing a portfolio that will achieve challenging return targets.




Stay connected with the Insights Blog

Popular Blog Posts

Market Commentary | Insights Blog

Chart of the Month | The Surprising Relationship Between Money Supply and Inflation

The potential for rising inflation is becoming a top concern for many investors and consumers. Many believe that inflation is already here as evidenced by price increases in commodities, homes,...
Perspectives | Insights Blog

The Case for Using the Higher Education Price Index® (HEPI) to Define Inflation for Colleges

When calculating return targets for an endowment portfolio, a conventional piece of the equation is often the Consumer Price Index (CPI). CPI plus 5% is the common short-hand formula for institutions...
Governance And Policy | Insights Blog

Endowment Management and the Three Primary Responsibilities of a Board

The fourth blog in the “Six Ps of Investment Stewardship” series addresses People, specifically how boards function within an organization. To learn more about the first four principles in the series...


Certain information contained herein has been obtained from or is based on third-party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified. Such information is as of the date indicated, if indicated, may not be complete, is subject to change and has not necessarily been updated. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is or will be given by The Common Fund for Nonprofit Organizations, any of its affiliates or any of its or their affiliates, trustees, directors, officers, employees or advisers (collectively referred to herein as “Commonfund”) or any other person as to the accuracy or completeness of the information in any third-party materials. Accordingly, Commonfund shall not be liable for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on any statement in, or omission from, such third-party materials, and any such liability is expressly disclaimed.

All rights to the trademarks, copyrights, logos and other intellectual property listed herein belong to their respective owners and the use of such logos hereof does not imply an affiliation with, or endorsement by, the owners of such trademarks, copyrights, logos and other intellectual property.

To the extent views presented forecast market activity, they may be based on many factors in addition to those explicitly stated herein. Forecasts of experts inevitably differ. Views attributed to third-parties are presented to demonstrate the existence of points of view, not as a basis for recommendations or as investment advice. Market and investment views of third-parties presented herein do not necessarily reflect the views of Commonfund, any manager retained by Commonfund to manage any investments for Commonfund (each, a “Manager”) or any fund managed by any Commonfund entity (each, a “Fund”). Accordingly, the views presented herein may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of Commonfund, any Manager or any Fund.

Statements concerning Commonfund’s views of possible future outcomes in any investment asset class or market, or of possible future economic developments, are not intended, and should not be construed, as forecasts or predictions of the future investment performance of any Fund. Such statements are also not intended as recommendations by any Commonfund entity or any Commonfund employee to the recipient of the presentation. It is Commonfund’s policy that investment recommendations to its clients must be based on the investment objectives and risk tolerances of each individual client. All market outlook and similar statements are based upon information reasonably available as of the date of this presentation (unless an earlier date is stated with regard to particular information), and reasonably believed to be accurate by Commonfund. Commonfund disclaims any responsibility to provide the recipient of this presentation with updated or corrected information or statements. Past performance is not indicative of future results. For more information please refer to Important Disclosures.