A False Sense of Diversification?

November 29, 2016 |
2 minute read

As we have undergone the process of re-underwriting all of Commonfund’s equity managers and funds over the last 6 months, we have tackled anew the age old question of how many funds does one multi-manager equity portfolio require to offer appropriate levels of diversification?

While there is no single universally appropriate answer, our research has indicated that, upon closer inspection, many multi-manager equity portfolios may not be quite as diversified as intended from a potential excess return perspective.

By and large, traditional active equity managers, as defined in our research by more than 2,000 US equity managers who report their results to Bloomberg, do well or poorly together in significant lock-step with how three second-order market risk factors are performing.  In the chart below we examine how active managers’ performance moves in response to three equity factors – size (small cap vs. large cap), volatility (high vs. low), and crowded trades (as represented by the Goldman Sachs VIP index).  Specifically, if small caps perform better than large caps, crowded trades outperform less-favored trades and higher volatility names do relatively well, chances are good that your traditional stock pickers will outperform their respective benchmarks.  In the reverse environment, the likelihood is that active managers will underperform.




Our findings are particularly relevant as some investors struggle with the question of whether to persevere with their actively managed equity portfolios or to throw in the towel and join the throngs of those investing passively.  At Commonfund, we firmly believe that active management will be a necessary ingredient in meeting long-term performance goals as we believe the passive beta available to investors from equity and fixed income allocations simply will not be enough to meet long-term spending and capital growth needs. 

The implications of these findings are nuanced but important.

  • First, and admittedly ancillary to this particular research, this does not indicate to us that one would want to abandon active management. On the contrary, coming out of a difficult environment for active management, reversion to the mean alone might portend better times to come.  We want to make sure that our client portfolios are positioned for any rebound in the active management environment by having verified alpha-generating stock pickers in our portfolios.  Furthermore, we will concentrate in our highest-conviction manager partners. 

  • Second, it is important to recognize that “traditional” active managers, or stock pickers, tend to gravitate towards equities that bubble up to express similar factor bets at the portfolio level. This indicates to us that while investors may gain comfort in feeling sufficiently diversified by having multiple stock pickers in their portfolios, the true diversification of the excess returns they are producing may be overestimated.

  • Finally, we are spending considerable resources to find and bring “non-traditional” active or excess return sources to our equity portfolios in pursuit of demonstrable diversification benefits. In other words, we do not want to have all of our eggs in the traditional active management basket.  We are executing this strategy through the targeted and risk-aware addition of quantifiably uncorrelated risk premia and diversified alpha strategies.  Needless to say, identifying managers that meet this criteria is no easy task, but well worth the effort.

Our investment philosophy is grounded in the three tenets of the endowment model – an equity bias, broad diversification and prudent use of illiquid investments to capture the premium they can offer – we believe they remain the foundation of a successful long-term investment portfolio.  But today we are executing the model using refined tools, like those described here, to isolate portfolio risks and identify uncorrelated sources of return more reliably.




Stay connected with the Insights Blog

Popular Blog Posts

Market Commentary | Insights Blog

Chart of the Month | The Surprising Relationship Between Money Supply and Inflation

The potential for rising inflation is becoming a top concern for many investors and consumers. Many believe that inflation is already here as evidenced by price increases in commodities, homes,...
Perspectives | Insights Blog

The Case for Using the Higher Education Price Index® (HEPI) to Define Inflation for Colleges

When calculating return targets for an endowment portfolio, a conventional piece of the equation is often the Consumer Price Index (CPI). CPI plus 5% is the common short-hand formula for institutions...
Governance And Policy | Insights Blog

Endowment Management and the Three Primary Responsibilities of a Board

The fourth blog in the “Six Ps of Investment Stewardship” series addresses People, specifically how boards function within an organization. To learn more about the first four principles in the series...


Certain information contained herein has been obtained from or is based on third-party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified. Such information is as of the date indicated, if indicated, may not be complete, is subject to change and has not necessarily been updated. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is or will be given by The Common Fund for Nonprofit Organizations, any of its affiliates or any of its or their affiliates, trustees, directors, officers, employees or advisers (collectively referred to herein as “Commonfund”) or any other person as to the accuracy or completeness of the information in any third-party materials. Accordingly, Commonfund shall not be liable for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on any statement in, or omission from, such third-party materials, and any such liability is expressly disclaimed.

All rights to the trademarks, copyrights, logos and other intellectual property listed herein belong to their respective owners and the use of such logos hereof does not imply an affiliation with, or endorsement by, the owners of such trademarks, copyrights, logos and other intellectual property.

To the extent views presented forecast market activity, they may be based on many factors in addition to those explicitly stated herein. Forecasts of experts inevitably differ. Views attributed to third-parties are presented to demonstrate the existence of points of view, not as a basis for recommendations or as investment advice. Market and investment views of third-parties presented herein do not necessarily reflect the views of Commonfund, any manager retained by Commonfund to manage any investments for Commonfund (each, a “Manager”) or any fund managed by any Commonfund entity (each, a “Fund”). Accordingly, the views presented herein may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of Commonfund, any Manager or any Fund.

Statements concerning Commonfund’s views of possible future outcomes in any investment asset class or market, or of possible future economic developments, are not intended, and should not be construed, as forecasts or predictions of the future investment performance of any Fund. Such statements are also not intended as recommendations by any Commonfund entity or any Commonfund employee to the recipient of the presentation. It is Commonfund’s policy that investment recommendations to its clients must be based on the investment objectives and risk tolerances of each individual client. All market outlook and similar statements are based upon information reasonably available as of the date of this presentation (unless an earlier date is stated with regard to particular information), and reasonably believed to be accurate by Commonfund. Commonfund disclaims any responsibility to provide the recipient of this presentation with updated or corrected information or statements. Past performance is not indicative of future results. For more information please refer to Important Disclosures.