Top Five Questions of Nonprofit Fiduciaries

January 27, 2016 |
4 minute read

The turbulent start to the New Year has led governing boards, investment committees and staff to question what’s next for the markets and what they should do about it.  Below are the top five concerns and questions we have heard followed by our guidance for nonprofit fiduciaries.

What Should We Do?

While human behavior often conditions us to “do something” in response to external stimuli, the most important guidance we offer clients is to be patient and stay the course. In counseling our clients not to focus inordinately on short-term market swings, we do recommend that you plan for the challenges of tempered returns over the next five years.  Believe in your policy portfolio and your Investment Policy Statement (IPS); however, revisit your assumptions and make sure that your IPS accurately reflects your risk tolerances and goals.  An effective IPS is a dynamic investment framework to guide your decisions through market cycles.  It should be flexible, but with sufficient rigor to protect the temptation to over react and “trade” out of down markets.    

As we outlined in our 2016 investment outlook, we believe that endowments and foundations will be challenged to achieve their long-term goal of a five percent real return over the next several years.  The process of unwinding or slowing the historic global stimulus policies since the financial crisis will likely lead to a repricing of risk assets, higher volatility and lower market returns over the next five years.

Investment committees and governing boards are well-served to assess all of the levers of their investment policy and broader enterprise. This certainly includes asset allocation, but also, and to the extent possible, spending policy and levels, development and gift flows and debt capacity.

How does Commonfund take advantage of a temporary market move and a longer term cyclical change?

Short term market moves are typically driven by momentum and flows while cyclical changes are usually based on more fundamental factors such as valuations and earnings.  We allocate to managers who can take advantage of short term disruptions, but generally favor managers with longer term cyclical views.  As an example, we do not believe that sub-$30 dollar oil is sustainable any more so than we thought that $145 dollar oil was sustainable in 2008.  We view current oil prices as a relatively short-term supply imbalance and not a foreboding of an imminent global recession.  As such, we continue to maintain a modest overweight to equities (particularly low-volatility strategies), but with underweights to energy producers who face slow growth or in the case of Brazil, Venezuela and Russia, deepening recessions.  Moreover, while our focus on valuation sensitive securities has been challenged in the current narrowly driven market environment, we remain confident that fundamentals will soon matter again and that the markets will discern between sectors that will benefit from the drop in energy costs versus those that will be challenged.

3. How significant is the risk of a recession and bear market?

In the United States, we see limited risk of a recession in 2016. The U.S. economy is projected to rebound to a two to three percent pace by mid-2016 and earnings growth outside of the energy and materials sector is still solid. The S&P 500 Index, however, is close to a technical bear market level, having dropped 15 percent from the highs of last summer, including about seven percent this year. We would not be surprised if U.S. equities were still to fall modestly from current levels, but we would view that as an opportunity to rebalance. That said, we brought down equity risk in portfolios in the second half of 2015 from levels of the last few years, anticipating a more challenging return and volatility environment into 2016 and beyond. Outside of the United States, energy and materials producing economies are already in recession and we maintain an underweight to those sectors.

4. What are the risks of contagion from the decline in oil prices and the economic challenges facing China?

We view the risks of a broad global contagion to be measurable, but nonetheless modest, especially for the United States. Globalization reminds us that the world’s capital flows are interconnected and that no economy is truly immune to systemic shocks elsewhere in the world. The risk of a further decline in oil prices and the economic slowdown in China is that it may export deflation globally – which would in turn weaken output. The typical policy response to this condition is more accommodative monetary policy, but this tool is limited after the historic levels of monetary stimulus since 2008 – although central banks in Europe, Japan and China have now signaled new potential for added stimulus.

We expect that the Fed may signal a holding pattern near term and move more slowly in the coming quarters to raise interest rates as a result. The slowdown in China will have a greater impact on its largest trading partners, such as Germany but less so in the United States as China represents less than one percent of U.S. exports. U.S. oil producers are feeling the strain of low prices and this pain is particularly felt among shale oil producers whose average breakeven cost is $50 per barrel. The result will be an increase in bankruptcies in the energy sector and local economic weakness, but not at a level to dramatically impact U.S. growth. The current environment reminds us of the challenges that unfolded in the spring of 1986 when a sharp drop in the price of crude oil to $10 per barrel produced a recession in the oil-producing regions of the U.S., but ultimately provided stimulus to consumers and those businesses that use energy as an input cost. The initial impact was a 10 percent drop in equity prices and a test of the economic cycle, but by year-end both the economy and the stock market recovered as the benefits of lower energy prices boosted consumer spending and non-energy business activity.  

5. How is Commonfund protecting portfolios from higher volatility while seeking opportunities for growth and return?

In this challenging market environment, we seek to reduce volatility by (1) allocating to lower volatility equity strategies and (2) eliminating “hidden” equity exposure. We will seek to reduce equity exposure in hedge portfolios by increasing allocations to long/short strategies that are intended to produce returns from alpha (manager skill) not market exposure. Several years ago we sought to incorporate low-volatility equity strategies into our investment strategy as we believed this would help our investors weather the drop in the price of oil as these strategies generally have only five basis points of exposure to the energy and materials sectors. We also looked to reduce credit exposure, especially in high yield fixed income which tends to be highly correlated to equity markets, specifically the challenges in the energy sector. For investors that can accept increased illiquidity in their portfolios, we believe that there will be significant opportunities over the coming years from market disruptions that are taking place now that will eventually include the emerging markets and the energy sector.

Steve Snyder


Steve Snyder

Managing Director

Stay connected with the Insights Blog

Popular Articles

Governance And Policy | Articles

Seven Promising Practices for the Future of Higher Education

Even before the pandemic, the college/university business model was under scrutiny. With rising tuition costs outpacing living wages, and student debt burdens crippling students, institutions of...
Investment Strategy | Articles

6 Keys to Choosing the Right Outsourced CIO

Today, few OCIOs that serve nonprofits are total institutional partners. Six questions can help you find one who takes a holistic approach. Not long ago, the definition and scope of an “Outsourced...
Governance And Policy | Articles

Outsourcing: Writing Your RFP

Once an institution decides to pursue the outsourced CIO or investment office option, it usually leads to the creation of a request for proposal, or RFP. Considering that the outsourced model is a...


Certain information contained herein has been obtained from or is based on third-party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified. Such information is as of the date indicated, if indicated, may not be complete, is subject to change and has not necessarily been updated. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is or will be given by The Common Fund for Nonprofit Organizations, any of its affiliates or any of its or their affiliates, trustees, directors, officers, employees or advisers (collectively referred to herein as “Commonfund”) or any other person as to the accuracy or completeness of the information in any third-party materials. Accordingly, Commonfund shall not be liable for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on any statement in, or omission from, such third-party materials, and any such liability is expressly disclaimed.

All rights to the trademarks, copyrights, logos and other intellectual property listed herein belong to their respective owners and the use of such logos hereof does not imply an affiliation with, or endorsement by, the owners of such trademarks, copyrights, logos and other intellectual property.

To the extent views presented forecast market activity, they may be based on many factors in addition to those explicitly stated herein. Forecasts of experts inevitably differ. Views attributed to third-parties are presented to demonstrate the existence of points of view, not as a basis for recommendations or as investment advice. Market and investment views of third-parties presented herein do not necessarily reflect the views of Commonfund, any manager retained by Commonfund to manage any investments for Commonfund (each, a “Manager”) or any fund managed by any Commonfund entity (each, a “Fund”). Accordingly, the views presented herein may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of Commonfund, any Manager or any Fund.

Statements concerning Commonfund’s views of possible future outcomes in any investment asset class or market, or of possible future economic developments, are not intended, and should not be construed, as forecasts or predictions of the future investment performance of any Fund. Such statements are also not intended as recommendations by any Commonfund entity or any Commonfund employee to the recipient of the presentation. It is Commonfund’s policy that investment recommendations to its clients must be based on the investment objectives and risk tolerances of each individual client. All market outlook and similar statements are based upon information reasonably available as of the date of this presentation (unless an earlier date is stated with regard to particular information), and reasonably believed to be accurate by Commonfund. Commonfund disclaims any responsibility to provide the recipient of this presentation with updated or corrected information or statements. Past performance is not indicative of future results. For more information please refer to Important Disclosures.