A Cost-Effective Approach to Hedge Fund Allocations: Part 2

October 11, 2018 |
3 minute read
|

Let’s start with a quick recap of Part 1 of this story, which can be boiled down to three main points:

  1.  Investors often spend too much for market beta, paying “2 and 20” for hedge funds that deliver significant embedded market return (beta), not manager skill (alpha).

  2. Commonfund seeks “alpha-only” strategies in its hedge fund portfolios but aims to source equivalent amounts of total portfolio beta exposure through more cost-effective strategies.

  3. Relative to peers, we advocate for a lower asset allocation to hedge funds which we believe is more cost effective.

What Should Your Hedge Fund Return Expectations Be?

We don’t believe that hedge funds, broadly defined and in aggregate, can outperform equity benchmarks over a full market cycle.  Moreover, our aversion to equity beta risk in hedge fund portfolios suggests that our hedge fund exposure will underperform traditional equity and hedge fund indices in a “risk-on” market but, conversely, outperform in a falling stock market.

Let’s, however, consider a more nuanced approach to performance expectations.  If our hedge fund strategy is designed to carry no beta, then the strategy’s return expectation ought to be roughly equivalent to its alpha expectation (on top of the prevailing rate paid for cash, defined as the yield on the U.S. 91-day Treasury bill).  So, how much alpha is reasonable to expect?

Before we propose an answer, let’s agree that positive alpha, while always our goal, is not a given in any allocation.   Hedge funds may produce negative results, especially over a short time frame, in much the same way an active equity or fixed income manager might underperform their traditional benchmark.  Taking that line of thinking one step further, a reasonable minimum benchmark for our hedge fund portfolio might be the comparable excess return (alpha) component we expect from our traditional equity and fixed income managers.  How do these compare?

Building Return Expectations

The alpha assumptions incorporated into our active risk asset allocation framework are based on long-term manager universe return data across investment types.  Our excess return assumptions reflect a competitive active management environment where alpha is scarce.  As shown in the chart, we would deem short-term fixed income managers minimally successful with 25 basis points of annual excess performance.  We expect bond managers with a credit component and equity managers to deliver an annual minimum 50 basis points in excess of their respective benchmarks.

CH1-alphaonlyp2-excessreturns

Hedge fund managers are advantaged relative to traditional asset class managers by a larger opportunity set, leverage flexibility and capital duration, which justifies higher alpha expectations.  Their higher fees also demand that we have a higher excess return expectation than traditional long-only strategies.

A Source of Uncorrelated Return

Thus, our alpha-centric hedge fund allocation carries a minimally acceptable return target of 91-day Treasury bills plus 200 basis points.  This is an ambitious minimum alpha goal as the median hedge fund has not delivered anywhere near a 200 basis point beta-adjusted return above cash over any long term time frame.  It is additionally important to note that T-Bills +200 is a floor and not a ceiling and is multiples of the alpha we seek from active risk allocations in traditional asset classes.  Furthermore, we are constantly on the lookout for managers who can add return potential.

A Complement to Fixed Income as a Portfolio Diversifier

Return targets, however, are only part of the hedge fund performance expectation story.  We rely on hedge funds to provide true diversification benefit relative to equity risk.  Typical hedge fund portfolios, in addition to producing underwhelming performance over the last 10 years, have been far more correlated to equity beta than is justified for an allocation often touted as a diversifier.  Our hedge fund portfolio construction process insists upon producing returns independent of traditional equity and credit betas, and, equally importantly, independent of primary risk factors, like duration, that drive fixed income returns.

A Portfolio Ballast

Relative to traditionally constructed hedge portfolios, in addition to being more cost efficient, we believe our process improves the odds of consistent alpha generation by largely eliminating the market timing element of investing (where most perform poorly).   Our approach should also reduce the negative impact of incentive fees by removing much of the volatility from market beta, thereby improving an investor’s odds of staying with a manager through a cycle.  And finally, our hedge fund strategy offers the possibility of producing positive absolute return when it will be needed most, that is, when markets are down.

Most significantly, our alpha-first, beta averse approach to hedge fund investing is fundamental to our asset allocation methodology, in which we seek to optimize for drawdown recovery time.  The siren call of beta in a bull market is strong, but we remain diligent in maintaining the integrity of purpose for hedge funds in portfolios.

 
Commonfund

Author

Commonfund

Stay connected with the Insights Blog

Popular Blog Posts


Market Commentary | Insights Blog

Chart of the Month | The Surprising Relationship Between Money Supply and Inflation

The potential for rising inflation is becoming a top concern for many investors and consumers. Many believe that inflation is already here as evidenced by price increases in commodities, homes,...
Perspectives | Insights Blog

The Case for Using the Higher Education Price Index® (HEPI) to Define Inflation for Colleges

When calculating return targets for an endowment portfolio, a conventional piece of the equation is often the Consumer Price Index (CPI). CPI plus 5% is the common short-hand formula for institutions...
Investment Strategy | Insights Blog

What is an OCIO?

Outsourced investment management, once primarily a solution for small institutions with limited resources, is now used by a broad range of long-term investors. When properly implemented, outsourcing...

Disclaimer

Certain information contained herein has been obtained from or is based on third-party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified. Such information is as of the date indicated, if indicated, may not be complete, is subject to change and has not necessarily been updated. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is or will be given by The Common Fund for Nonprofit Organizations, any of its affiliates or any of its or their affiliates, trustees, directors, officers, employees or advisers (collectively referred to herein as “Commonfund”) or any other person as to the accuracy or completeness of the information in any third-party materials. Accordingly, Commonfund shall not be liable for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on any statement in, or omission from, such third-party materials, and any such liability is expressly disclaimed.

All rights to the trademarks, copyrights, logos and other intellectual property listed herein belong to their respective owners and the use of such logos hereof does not imply an affiliation with, or endorsement by, the owners of such trademarks, copyrights, logos and other intellectual property.

To the extent views presented forecast market activity, they may be based on many factors in addition to those explicitly stated herein. Forecasts of experts inevitably differ. Views attributed to third-parties are presented to demonstrate the existence of points of view, not as a basis for recommendations or as investment advice. Market and investment views of third-parties presented herein do not necessarily reflect the views of Commonfund, any manager retained by Commonfund to manage any investments for Commonfund (each, a “Manager”) or any fund managed by any Commonfund entity (each, a “Fund”). Accordingly, the views presented herein may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of Commonfund, any Manager or any Fund.

Statements concerning Commonfund’s views of possible future outcomes in any investment asset class or market, or of possible future economic developments, are not intended, and should not be construed, as forecasts or predictions of the future investment performance of any Fund. Such statements are also not intended as recommendations by any Commonfund entity or any Commonfund employee to the recipient of the presentation. It is Commonfund’s policy that investment recommendations to its clients must be based on the investment objectives and risk tolerances of each individual client. All market outlook and similar statements are based upon information reasonably available as of the date of this presentation (unless an earlier date is stated with regard to particular information), and reasonably believed to be accurate by Commonfund. Commonfund disclaims any responsibility to provide the recipient of this presentation with updated or corrected information or statements. Past performance is not indicative of future results. For more information please refer to Important Disclosures.