Hedge Funds: How Many (or Few) Does it Take?

April 8, 2016 |
2 minute read

It’s straightforward to get an answer to that question, at least superficially: draw at random from a manager universe, build hypothetical portfolios with the selected managers, track performance, repeat thousands of times, and based on the average result, arrive at an optimal portfolio size.

The example below is an example of such a simulation. Using HFRI universe data from 1997 to 2015, it draws five-year samples for 65 randomly selected managers at a time (restricted to only those with full track records in that time period), and estimates the Sharpe Ratio¹ of the resulting portfolios, from single-manager to the full 65. After tallying the results and charting them, it becomes clear that the answer is: “not very many.” Improvement in Sharpe tops out somewhere between 5-7 funds, and while it does continue to climb, it does so only in small increments, making a weak case for spending resources on finding and vetting new managers.

ch1-HF-sharpesim-hedge fundsIt is a powerful result, but by itself, simulation results such as these do not address what is perhaps the larger and more significant question: what is it about the hedge fund universe that makes random selection produce an answer of “not very many”? What is the answer sensitive to, and what does it suggest about the hedge fund universe that the answer is 5-7 as opposed to 10-20, or even 30-40? There are, after all, thousands of active hedge funds pursuing very different strategies.

Consider the surface diagram below, a parallel experiment conducted this time on a hypothetical universe of returns; this time, they are randomly generated, but given the same means and standard deviations as managers in the real hedge fund world, but with controlled correlation. In other words, we can see how the shape of the “how many managers” arc changes along with correlation. As correlation along the x axis climbs from 0 to 1, the arc flat-lines, but at zero correlation, the line continues to climb through 70 managers.

ch2-HF-managers-hedge fundsThe “how many managers” question is sensitive, then, to the correlation and commonality of risk of the underlying manager universe.

What if we return to the real world, and repeat the simulation, but this time instead of selecting randomly, we impose constraints on the random selection rule? While we cannot control correlation of returns in the real world, we can control the correlation of managers we add to our simulated portfolios.

In other words, if we use an “un-correlated” rule to add managers, in effect maximizing the aggregate diversification of the pro forma portfolio, and isolating the hypothetical large part of the curve, the results are quite different. Notably, it looks much more like the zero-correlation section of the surface diagram.

How do we consider the contrast in these two results? The randomly selected model suggests that there is a commonality of risk that essentially nullifies diversification benefit of adding hedge funds at random past a handful of managers. Return commonality is a hazard of hedge fund investing. The uncorrelated experiment, however, gives a much more robust picture of the hedge fund universe as a resource for potential diversification.

ch3-HF-sharpesim¹Sharpe Ratio: A risk-adjusted measure, calculated using standard deviation and excess return to determine reward per unit of risk. A greater Sharpe Ratio indicates better historical risk-adjusted performance.

Kristofer Kwait


Kristofer Kwait

Chief Market Strategist

Kristofer Kwait


John Delano

Managing Director, Head of Research and Analytics

Stay connected with the Insights Blog

Popular Blog Posts

Market Commentary | Insights Blog

Chart of the Month | The Surprising Relationship Between Money Supply and Inflation

The potential for rising inflation is becoming a top concern for many investors and consumers. Many believe that inflation is already here as evidenced by price increases in commodities, homes,...
Perspectives | Insights Blog

The Case for Using the Higher Education Price Index® (HEPI) to Define Inflation for Colleges

When calculating return targets for an endowment portfolio, a conventional piece of the equation is often the Consumer Price Index (CPI). CPI plus 5% is the common short-hand formula for institutions...
Governance And Policy | Insights Blog

Endowment Management and the Three Primary Responsibilities of a Board

The fourth blog in the “Six Ps of Investment Stewardship” series addresses People, specifically how boards function within an organization. To learn more about the first four principles in the series...


Certain information contained herein has been obtained from or is based on third-party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified. Such information is as of the date indicated, if indicated, may not be complete, is subject to change and has not necessarily been updated. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is or will be given by The Common Fund for Nonprofit Organizations, any of its affiliates or any of its or their affiliates, trustees, directors, officers, employees or advisers (collectively referred to herein as “Commonfund”) or any other person as to the accuracy or completeness of the information in any third-party materials. Accordingly, Commonfund shall not be liable for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of relying on any statement in, or omission from, such third-party materials, and any such liability is expressly disclaimed.

All rights to the trademarks, copyrights, logos and other intellectual property listed herein belong to their respective owners and the use of such logos hereof does not imply an affiliation with, or endorsement by, the owners of such trademarks, copyrights, logos and other intellectual property.

To the extent views presented forecast market activity, they may be based on many factors in addition to those explicitly stated herein. Forecasts of experts inevitably differ. Views attributed to third-parties are presented to demonstrate the existence of points of view, not as a basis for recommendations or as investment advice. Market and investment views of third-parties presented herein do not necessarily reflect the views of Commonfund, any manager retained by Commonfund to manage any investments for Commonfund (each, a “Manager”) or any fund managed by any Commonfund entity (each, a “Fund”). Accordingly, the views presented herein may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of Commonfund, any Manager or any Fund.

Statements concerning Commonfund’s views of possible future outcomes in any investment asset class or market, or of possible future economic developments, are not intended, and should not be construed, as forecasts or predictions of the future investment performance of any Fund. Such statements are also not intended as recommendations by any Commonfund entity or any Commonfund employee to the recipient of the presentation. It is Commonfund’s policy that investment recommendations to its clients must be based on the investment objectives and risk tolerances of each individual client. All market outlook and similar statements are based upon information reasonably available as of the date of this presentation (unless an earlier date is stated with regard to particular information), and reasonably believed to be accurate by Commonfund. Commonfund disclaims any responsibility to provide the recipient of this presentation with updated or corrected information or statements. Past performance is not indicative of future results. For more information please refer to Important Disclosures.